Information on Result #691177
Linear OA(923, 89, F9, 12) (dual of [89, 66, 13]-code), using construction X applied to Ce(11) ⊂ Ce(7) based on
- linear OA(920, 81, F9, 12) (dual of [81, 61, 13]-code), using an extension Ce(11) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- linear OA(915, 81, F9, 8) (dual of [81, 66, 9]-code), using an extension Ce(7) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,7], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 8 [i]
- linear OA(93, 8, F9, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,9) or 8-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 9, F9, 3) (dual of [9, 6, 4]-code or 9-arc in PG(2,9) or 9-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 9, F9, 3) (dual of [9, 6, 4]-code or 9-arc in PG(2,9) or 9-cap in PG(2,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.