Information on Result #691201
Linear OA(955, 95, F9, 32) (dual of [95, 40, 33]-code), using construction X applied to Ce(31) ⊂ Ce(24) based on
- linear OA(948, 81, F9, 32) (dual of [81, 33, 33]-code), using an extension Ce(31) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,31], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 32 [i]
- linear OA(941, 81, F9, 25) (dual of [81, 40, 26]-code), using an extension Ce(24) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,24], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 25 [i]
- linear OA(97, 14, F9, 6) (dual of [14, 7, 7]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(97, 17, F9, 6) (dual of [17, 10, 7]-code), using
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(97, 17, F9, 6) (dual of [17, 10, 7]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.