Information on Result #691253
Linear OA(989, 105, F9, 62) (dual of [105, 16, 63]-code), using construction X applied to Ce(61) ⊂ Ce(49) based on
- linear OA(975, 81, F9, 62) (dual of [81, 6, 63]-code), using an extension Ce(61) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,61], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 62 [i]
- linear OA(965, 81, F9, 50) (dual of [81, 16, 51]-code), using an extension Ce(49) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,49], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 50 [i]
- linear OA(914, 24, F9, 11) (dual of [24, 10, 12]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(914, 28, F9, 11) (dual of [28, 14, 12]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,16P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,16P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(914, 28, F9, 11) (dual of [28, 14, 12]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(989, 105, F9, 61) (dual of [105, 16, 62]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | Linear OA(987, 103, F9, 60) (dual of [103, 16, 61]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |