Information on Result #691395
Linear OA(983, 93, F9, 62) (dual of [93, 10, 63]-code), using construction XX applied to Ce(61) ⊂ Ce(59) ⊂ Ce(52) based on
- linear OA(975, 81, F9, 62) (dual of [81, 6, 63]-code), using an extension Ce(61) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,61], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 62 [i]
- linear OA(972, 81, F9, 60) (dual of [81, 9, 61]-code), using an extension Ce(59) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,59], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 60 [i]
- linear OA(970, 81, F9, 53) (dual of [81, 11, 54]-code), using an extension Ce(52) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,52], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 53 [i]
- linear OA(91, 5, F9, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- linear OA(96, 7, F9, 6) (dual of [7, 1, 7]-code or 7-arc in PG(5,9)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 7 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.