Information on Result #691504

Linear OA(940, 48, F9, 30) (dual of [48, 8, 31]-code), using construction X applied to Ce(29) ⊂ Ce(24) based on
  1. linear OA(936, 41, F9, 30) (dual of [41, 5, 31]-code), using an extension Ce(29) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 40 | 92−1, defining interval I = [1,29], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 30 [i]
  2. linear OA(933, 41, F9, 25) (dual of [41, 8, 26]-code), using an extension Ce(24) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 40 | 92−1, defining interval I = [1,24], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 25 [i]
  3. linear OA(94, 7, F9, 4) (dual of [7, 3, 5]-code or 7-arc in PG(3,9)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(939, 47, F9, 29) (dual of [47, 8, 30]-code) [i]Truncation
2Linear OOA(940, 24, F9, 2, 30) (dual of [(24, 2), 8, 31]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding