Information on Result #701414

Linear OA(729, 52, F7, 19) (dual of [52, 23, 20]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C({0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,16,41}), C2 = C([0,17]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,16]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C({0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,16,17,41}) based on
  1. linear OA(727, 48, F7, 18) (dual of [48, 21, 19]-code), using the primitive cyclic code C(A) with length 48 = 72−1, defining set A = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,16,41}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{−1,0,…,16}|+1 = 19 (BCH-bound) [i]
  2. linear OA(727, 48, F7, 18) (dual of [48, 21, 19]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 48 = 72−1, defining interval I = [0,17], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 19 [i]
  3. linear OA(729, 48, F7, 19) (dual of [48, 19, 20]-code), using the primitive cyclic code C(A) with length 48 = 72−1, defining set A = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,16,17,41}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{−1,0,…,17}|+1 = 20 (BCH-bound) [i]
  4. linear OA(725, 48, F7, 17) (dual of [48, 23, 18]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 48 = 72−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 18 [i]
  5. linear OA(70, 2, F7, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
  6. linear OA(70, 2, F7, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(729, 26, F7, 2, 19) (dual of [(26, 2), 23, 20]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding