Information on Result #701431

Linear OA(749, 73, F7, 27) (dual of [73, 24, 28]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C({0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,16,20,27,34,40,41}), C2 = C([1,18]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([1,16]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C({0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,16,17,18,20,27,34,40,41}) based on
  1. linear OA(734, 48, F7, 25) (dual of [48, 14, 26]-code), using the primitive cyclic code C(A) with length 48 = 72−1, defining set A = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,16,20,27,34,40,41}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,16}|+1 = 26 (BCH-bound) [i]
  2. linear OA(728, 48, F7, 18) (dual of [48, 20, 19]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 48 = 72−1, defining interval I = [1,18], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 19 [i]
  3. linear OA(738, 48, F7, 27) (dual of [48, 10, 28]-code), using the primitive cyclic code C(A) with length 48 = 72−1, defining set A = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,16,17,18,20,27,34,40,41}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,18}|+1 = 28 (BCH-bound) [i]
  4. linear OA(724, 48, F7, 16) (dual of [48, 24, 17]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 48 = 72−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
  5. linear OA(710, 20, F7, 8) (dual of [20, 10, 9]-code), using
  6. linear OA(71, 5, F7, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.