Information on Result #701551

Linear OA(840, 65, F8, 28) (dual of [65, 25, 29]-code), using the cyclic code C(A) with length 65 | 84−1, defining set A = {3,4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14,19}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{12,40,3,…,−12}|+1 = 29 (BCH-bound)

Mode: Constructive and linear.

This result is hidden, because other results with identical parameters exist.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(840, 65, F8, 27) (dual of [65, 25, 28]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(840, 65, F8, 26) (dual of [65, 25, 27]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(841, 66, F8, 28) (dual of [66, 25, 29]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
4Linear OA(837, 62, F8, 25) (dual of [62, 25, 26]-code) [i]Truncation
5Linear OA(836, 61, F8, 24) (dual of [61, 25, 25]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(835, 60, F8, 23) (dual of [60, 25, 24]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(834, 59, F8, 22) (dual of [59, 25, 23]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(8105, 130, F8, 57) (dual of [130, 25, 58]-code) [i]Repeating Each Code Word
9Linear OA(2185, 260, F2, 57) (dual of [260, 75, 58]-code) [i]Concatenation of Two Codes
10Linear OA(845, 70, F8, 30) (dual of [70, 25, 31]-code) [i]Construction X with Cyclic Codes
11Linear OA(867, 91, F8, 39) (dual of [91, 24, 40]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(868, 93, F8, 39) (dual of [93, 25, 40]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(851, 75, F8, 32) (dual of [75, 24, 33]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(852, 77, F8, 32) (dual of [77, 25, 33]-code) [i]