Information on Result #701929

Linear OA(2159, 302, F2, 40) (dual of [302, 143, 41]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([219,254]), C2 = C([227,4]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([227,254]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([219,4]) based on
  1. linear OA(2124, 255, F2, 36) (dual of [255, 131, 37]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−36,−35,…,−1}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 37 [i]
  2. linear OA(2125, 255, F2, 33) (dual of [255, 130, 34]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−28,−27,…,4}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
  3. linear OA(2141, 255, F2, 41) (dual of [255, 114, 42]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−36,−35,…,4}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 42 [i]
  4. linear OA(2108, 255, F2, 28) (dual of [255, 147, 29]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−28,−27,…,−1}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
  5. linear OA(212, 24, F2, 7) (dual of [24, 12, 8]-code), using
  6. linear OA(26, 23, F2, 3) (dual of [23, 17, 4]-code or 23-cap in PG(5,2)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(2161, 304, F2, 40) (dual of [304, 143, 41]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
2Linear OA(2160, 303, F2, 41) (dual of [303, 143, 42]-code) [i]Adding a Parity Check Bit
3Linear OOA(2159, 151, F2, 2, 40) (dual of [(151, 2), 143, 41]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding