Information on Result #702101

Linear OA(2229, 267, F2, 93) (dual of [267, 38, 94]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([171,8]), C2 = C([169,4]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([171,4]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([169,8]) based on
  1. linear OA(2225, 255, F2, 93) (dual of [255, 30, 94]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−84,−83,…,8}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 94 [i]
  2. linear OA(2219, 255, F2, 91) (dual of [255, 36, 92]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−86,−85,…,4}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 92 [i]
  3. linear OA(2227, 255, F2, 95) (dual of [255, 28, 96]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−86,−85,…,8}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 96 [i]
  4. linear OA(2217, 255, F2, 89) (dual of [255, 38, 90]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−84,−83,…,4}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 90 [i]
  5. linear OA(21, 9, F2, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
  6. linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(2229, 267, F2, 92) (dual of [267, 38, 93]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(2228, 266, F2, 92) (dual of [266, 38, 93]-code) [i]Truncation
3Linear OOA(2229, 133, F2, 2, 93) (dual of [(133, 2), 37, 94]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
4Linear OOA(2229, 89, F2, 3, 93) (dual of [(89, 3), 38, 94]-NRT-code) [i]
5Linear OOA(2229, 38, F2, 7, 93) (dual of [(38, 7), 37, 94]-NRT-code) [i]