Information on Result #702125

Linear OA(2248, 278, F2, 103) (dual of [278, 30, 104]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([171,16]), C2 = C([169,8]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([171,8]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([169,16]) based on
  1. linear OA(2233, 255, F2, 101) (dual of [255, 22, 102]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−84,−83,…,16}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 102 [i]
  2. linear OA(2227, 255, F2, 95) (dual of [255, 28, 96]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−86,−85,…,8}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 96 [i]
  3. linear OA(2235, 255, F2, 103) (dual of [255, 20, 104]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−86,−85,…,16}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 104 [i]
  4. linear OA(2225, 255, F2, 93) (dual of [255, 30, 94]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = {−84,−83,…,8}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 94 [i]
  5. linear OA(212, 20, F2, 7) (dual of [20, 8, 8]-code), using
  6. linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(2248, 278, F2, 102) (dual of [278, 30, 103]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(2249, 279, F2, 103) (dual of [279, 30, 104]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
3Linear OA(2250, 280, F2, 103) (dual of [280, 30, 104]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(2252, 282, F2, 103) (dual of [282, 30, 104]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(2247, 277, F2, 102) (dual of [277, 30, 103]-code) [i]Truncation
6Linear OA(2246, 276, F2, 101) (dual of [276, 30, 102]-code) [i]
7Linear OOA(2248, 139, F2, 2, 103) (dual of [(139, 2), 30, 104]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding