Information on Result #703330
Linear OA(385, 261, F3, 25) (dual of [261, 176, 26]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([239,19]), C2 = C([0,21]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,19]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([239,21]) based on
- linear OA(376, 242, F3, 23) (dual of [242, 166, 24]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,19}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(371, 242, F3, 22) (dual of [242, 171, 23]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [0,21], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(381, 242, F3, 25) (dual of [242, 161, 26]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,21}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- linear OA(366, 242, F3, 20) (dual of [242, 176, 21]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [0,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
- linear OA(33, 13, F3, 2) (dual of [13, 10, 3]-code), using
- Hamming code H(3,3) [i]
- linear OA(31, 6, F3, 1) (dual of [6, 5, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(386, 262, F3, 25) (dual of [262, 176, 26]-code) | [i] | Code Embedding in Larger Space | |
2 | Linear OOA(385, 130, F3, 2, 25) (dual of [(130, 2), 175, 26]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
3 | Linear OOA(385, 87, F3, 3, 25) (dual of [(87, 3), 176, 26]-NRT-code) | [i] |