Information on Result #703607

Linear OA(3132, 264, F3, 43) (dual of [264, 132, 44]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([239,37]), C2 = C([1,39]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([1,37]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([239,39]) based on
  1. linear OA(3121, 242, F3, 41) (dual of [242, 121, 42]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,37}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 42 [i]
  2. linear OA(3115, 242, F3, 39) (dual of [242, 127, 40]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [1,39], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 40 [i]
  3. linear OA(3126, 242, F3, 43) (dual of [242, 116, 44]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,39}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 44 [i]
  4. linear OA(3110, 242, F3, 37) (dual of [242, 132, 38]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [1,37], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 38 [i]
  5. linear OA(35, 16, F3, 3) (dual of [16, 11, 4]-code or 16-cap in PG(4,3)), using
  6. linear OA(31, 6, F3, 1) (dual of [6, 5, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(3132, 264, F3, 42) (dual of [264, 132, 43]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(3134, 266, F3, 43) (dual of [266, 132, 44]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
3Linear OOA(3132, 132, F3, 2, 43) (dual of [(132, 2), 132, 44]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
4Linear OOA(3132, 88, F3, 3, 43) (dual of [(88, 3), 132, 44]-NRT-code) [i]