Information on Result #711210
Linear OA(586, 668, F5, 23) (dual of [668, 582, 24]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([618,12]), C2 = C([0,16]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,12]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([618,16]) based on
- linear OA(561, 624, F5, 19) (dual of [624, 563, 20]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = {−6,−5,…,12}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
- linear OA(553, 624, F5, 17) (dual of [624, 571, 18]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 18 [i]
- linear OA(573, 624, F5, 23) (dual of [624, 551, 24]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = {−6,−5,…,16}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(541, 624, F5, 13) (dual of [624, 583, 14]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 14 [i]
- linear OA(59, 28, F5, 5) (dual of [28, 19, 6]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C({0,1,2,19}), C2 = C([0,3]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,2]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C({0,1,2,3,19}) [i] based on
- linear OA(57, 24, F5, 4) (dual of [24, 17, 5]-code), using the primitive cyclic code C(A) with length 24 = 52−1, defining set A = {0,1,2,19}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{−1,0,1,2}|+1 = 5 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(57, 24, F5, 4) (dual of [24, 17, 5]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 24 = 52−1, defining interval I = [0,3], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- linear OA(59, 24, F5, 5) (dual of [24, 15, 6]-code), using the primitive cyclic code C(A) with length 24 = 52−1, defining set A = {0,1,2,3,19}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{−1,0,1,2,3}|+1 = 6 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(55, 24, F5, 3) (dual of [24, 19, 4]-code or 24-cap in PG(4,5)), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 24 = 52−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 4 [i]
- linear OA(50, 2, F5, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(50, s, F5, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(50, 2, F5, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C({0,1,2,19}), C2 = C([0,3]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,2]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C({0,1,2,3,19}) [i] based on
- linear OA(54, 16, F5, 3) (dual of [16, 12, 4]-code or 16-cap in PG(3,5)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(586, 334, F5, 2, 23) (dual of [(334, 2), 582, 24]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(586, 222, F5, 3, 23) (dual of [(222, 3), 580, 24]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||