Information on Result #711654
Linear OA(5121, 679, F5, 33) (dual of [679, 558, 34]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([618,20]), C2 = C([0,26]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,20]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([618,26]) based on
- linear OA(585, 624, F5, 27) (dual of [624, 539, 28]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = {−6,−5,…,20}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 28 [i]
- linear OA(583, 624, F5, 27) (dual of [624, 541, 28]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = [0,26], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 28 [i]
- linear OA(5103, 624, F5, 33) (dual of [624, 521, 34]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = {−6,−5,…,26}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
- linear OA(565, 624, F5, 21) (dual of [624, 559, 22]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- linear OA(59, 28, F5, 5) (dual of [28, 19, 6]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C({0,1,2,19}), C2 = C([0,3]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,2]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C({0,1,2,3,19}) [i] based on
- linear OA(57, 24, F5, 4) (dual of [24, 17, 5]-code), using the primitive cyclic code C(A) with length 24 = 52−1, defining set A = {0,1,2,19}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{−1,0,1,2}|+1 = 5 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(57, 24, F5, 4) (dual of [24, 17, 5]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 24 = 52−1, defining interval I = [0,3], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- linear OA(59, 24, F5, 5) (dual of [24, 15, 6]-code), using the primitive cyclic code C(A) with length 24 = 52−1, defining set A = {0,1,2,3,19}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{−1,0,1,2,3}|+1 = 6 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(55, 24, F5, 3) (dual of [24, 19, 4]-code or 24-cap in PG(4,5)), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 24 = 52−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 4 [i]
- linear OA(50, 2, F5, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(50, s, F5, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(50, 2, F5, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C({0,1,2,19}), C2 = C([0,3]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,2]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C({0,1,2,3,19}) [i] based on
- linear OA(59, 27, F5, 5) (dual of [27, 18, 6]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,2]) ⊂ C([1,2]) [i] based on
- linear OA(59, 26, F5, 5) (dual of [26, 17, 6]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 26 | 54−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,0,1,2}|+1 = 6 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(58, 26, F5, 4) (dual of [26, 18, 5]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 26 | 54−1, defining interval I = [1,2], and minimum distance d ≥ |{5,16,1}| + |{−9,−6,−3,0}∖{−3,−9}| = 5 (general Roos-bound) [i]
- linear OA(50, 1, F5, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(50, s, F5, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s (see above)
- construction X applied to C([0,2]) ⊂ C([1,2]) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.