Information on Result #714614

Linear OA(841, 73, F8, 24) (dual of [73, 32, 25]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([60,19]), C2 = C([0,20]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,19]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([60,20]) based on
  1. linear OA(837, 63, F8, 23) (dual of [63, 26, 24]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,19}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
  2. linear OA(833, 63, F8, 21) (dual of [63, 30, 22]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
  3. linear OA(839, 63, F8, 24) (dual of [63, 24, 25]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,20}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 25 [i]
  4. linear OA(831, 63, F8, 20) (dual of [63, 32, 21]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [0,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
  5. linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
  6. linear OA(80, 2, F8, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(841, 36, F8, 2, 24) (dual of [(36, 2), 31, 25]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding