Information on Result #714618

Linear OA(859, 92, F8, 31) (dual of [92, 33, 32]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([53,18]), C2 = C([0,20]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,18]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([53,20]) based on
  1. linear OA(842, 63, F8, 29) (dual of [63, 21, 30]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = {−10,−9,…,18}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 30 [i]
  2. linear OA(833, 63, F8, 21) (dual of [63, 30, 22]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
  3. linear OA(846, 63, F8, 31) (dual of [63, 17, 32]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = {−10,−9,…,20}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 32 [i]
  4. linear OA(829, 63, F8, 19) (dual of [63, 34, 20]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [0,18], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
  5. linear OA(812, 24, F8, 9) (dual of [24, 12, 10]-code), using
  6. linear OA(81, 5, F8, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(859, 46, F8, 2, 31) (dual of [(46, 2), 33, 32]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding