Information on Result #717637
Linear OA(927, 87, F9, 15) (dual of [87, 60, 16]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([78,11]), C2 = C([0,12]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,11]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([78,12]) based on
- linear OA(924, 80, F9, 14) (dual of [80, 56, 15]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−2,−1,…,11}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- linear OA(922, 80, F9, 13) (dual of [80, 58, 14]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 14 [i]
- linear OA(926, 80, F9, 15) (dual of [80, 54, 16]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−2,−1,…,12}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(920, 80, F9, 12) (dual of [80, 60, 13]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(91, 5, F9, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- linear OA(90, 2, F9, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(90, s, F9, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(927, 29, F9, 3, 15) (dual of [(29, 3), 60, 16]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding |