Information on Result #717689
Linear OA(940, 93, F9, 22) (dual of [93, 53, 23]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([0,19]), C2 = C([5,21]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([5,19]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([0,21]) based on
- linear OA(932, 80, F9, 20) (dual of [80, 48, 21]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
- linear OA(930, 80, F9, 17) (dual of [80, 50, 18]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {5,6,…,21}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 18 [i]
- linear OA(935, 80, F9, 22) (dual of [80, 45, 23]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,21], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(927, 80, F9, 15) (dual of [80, 53, 16]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {5,6,…,19}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(94, 9, F9, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,9) [i]
- linear OA(91, 4, F9, 1) (dual of [4, 3, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.