Information on Result #717785
Linear OA(961, 105, F9, 33) (dual of [105, 44, 34]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([70,20]), C2 = C([0,22]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,20]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([70,22]) based on
- linear OA(946, 80, F9, 31) (dual of [80, 34, 32]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−10,−9,…,20}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 32 [i]
- linear OA(937, 80, F9, 23) (dual of [80, 43, 24]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(950, 80, F9, 33) (dual of [80, 30, 34]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−10,−9,…,22}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
- linear OA(933, 80, F9, 21) (dual of [80, 47, 22]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- linear OA(91, 5, F9, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.