Information on Result #718102
Linear OA(974, 105, F9, 44) (dual of [105, 31, 45]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([70,31]), C2 = C([0,33]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,31]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([70,33]) based on
- linear OA(959, 80, F9, 42) (dual of [80, 21, 43]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−10,−9,…,31}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 43 [i]
- linear OA(952, 80, F9, 34) (dual of [80, 28, 35]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,33], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 35 [i]
- linear OA(963, 80, F9, 44) (dual of [80, 17, 45]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−10,−9,…,33}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 45 [i]
- linear OA(948, 80, F9, 32) (dual of [80, 32, 33]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,31], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
- linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- linear OA(91, 5, F9, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.