Information on Result #718159

Linear OA(987, 119, F9, 50) (dual of [119, 32, 51]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([11,50]), C2 = C([1,39]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([11,39]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1,50]) based on
  1. linear OA(956, 80, F9, 40) (dual of [80, 24, 41]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {11,12,…,50}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 41 [i]
  2. linear OA(955, 80, F9, 39) (dual of [80, 25, 40]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,39], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 40 [i]
  3. linear OA(965, 80, F9, 50) (dual of [80, 15, 51]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,50], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 51 [i]
  4. linear OA(944, 80, F9, 29) (dual of [80, 36, 30]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {11,12,…,39}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 30 [i]
  5. linear OA(912, 20, F9, 10) (dual of [20, 8, 11]-code), using
  6. linear OA(910, 19, F9, 9) (dual of [19, 9, 10]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.