Information on Result #718207

Linear OA(986, 114, F9, 51) (dual of [114, 28, 52]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([7,50]), C2 = C([0,39]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([7,39]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([0,50]) based on
  1. linear OA(963, 80, F9, 44) (dual of [80, 17, 45]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {7,8,…,50}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 45 [i]
  2. linear OA(956, 80, F9, 40) (dual of [80, 24, 41]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,39], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 41 [i]
  3. linear OA(966, 80, F9, 51) (dual of [80, 14, 52]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,50], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 52 [i]
  4. linear OA(951, 80, F9, 33) (dual of [80, 29, 34]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {7,8,…,39}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
  5. linear OA(913, 24, F9, 10) (dual of [24, 11, 11]-code), using
  6. linear OA(96, 10, F9, 6) (dual of [10, 4, 7]-code or 10-arc in PG(5,9)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.