Information on Result #718338

Linear OA(986, 105, F9, 58) (dual of [105, 19, 59]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([71,41]), C2 = C([0,49]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,41]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([71,49]) based on
  1. linear OA(967, 80, F9, 51) (dual of [80, 13, 52]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−9,−8,…,41}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 52 [i]
  2. linear OA(965, 80, F9, 50) (dual of [80, 15, 51]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,49], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 51 [i]
  3. linear OA(971, 80, F9, 59) (dual of [80, 9, 60]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−9,−8,…,49}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 60 [i]
  4. linear OA(959, 80, F9, 42) (dual of [80, 21, 43]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,41], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 43 [i]
  5. linear OA(99, 15, F9, 8) (dual of [15, 6, 9]-code), using
  6. linear OA(96, 10, F9, 6) (dual of [10, 4, 7]-code or 10-arc in PG(5,9)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(985, 104, F9, 57) (dual of [104, 19, 58]-code) [i]Truncation
2Linear OA(984, 103, F9, 56) (dual of [103, 19, 57]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(983, 102, F9, 55) (dual of [102, 19, 56]-code) [i]
4Linear OOA(986, 52, F9, 2, 58) (dual of [(52, 2), 18, 59]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding