Information on Result #718383

Linear OA(9106, 123, F9, 69) (dual of [123, 17, 70]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([11,69]), C2 = C([1,51]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([11,51]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1,69]) based on
  1. linear OA(971, 80, F9, 59) (dual of [80, 9, 60]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {11,12,…,69}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 60 [i]
  2. linear OA(967, 80, F9, 51) (dual of [80, 13, 52]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,51], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 52 [i]
  3. linear OA(976, 80, F9, 69) (dual of [80, 4, 70]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,69], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 70 [i]
  4. linear OA(958, 80, F9, 41) (dual of [80, 22, 42]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {11,12,…,51}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 42 [i]
  5. linear OA(920, 28, F9, 17) (dual of [28, 8, 18]-code), using
  6. linear OA(910, 15, F9, 9) (dual of [15, 5, 10]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.