Information on Result #724333
Linear OA(2599, 686, F25, 40) (dual of [686, 587, 41]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([621,26]), C2 = C([8,36]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([8,26]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([621,36]) based on
- linear OA(2556, 624, F25, 30) (dual of [624, 568, 31]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,26}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- linear OA(2557, 624, F25, 29) (dual of [624, 567, 30]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {8,9,…,36}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 30 [i]
- linear OA(2576, 624, F25, 40) (dual of [624, 548, 41]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,36}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 41 [i]
- linear OA(2537, 624, F25, 19) (dual of [624, 587, 20]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {8,9,…,26}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
- linear OA(2512, 31, F25, 10) (dual of [31, 19, 11]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,5P) ⊂ AG(F,6P) [i] based on
- linear OA(2510, 26, F25, 10) (dual of [26, 16, 11]-code or 26-arc in PG(9,25)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+6P) with degQ = 3 and degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26, using the rational function field F25(x) [i]
- linear OA(257, 26, F25, 7) (dual of [26, 19, 8]-code or 26-arc in PG(6,25)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,9P) with degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26 (see above)
- linear OA(252, 5, F25, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(252, 25, F25, 2) (dual of [25, 23, 3]-code or 25-arc in PG(1,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(23,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(252, 25, F25, 2) (dual of [25, 23, 3]-code or 25-arc in PG(1,25)), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,5P) ⊂ AG(F,6P) [i] based on
- linear OA(2511, 31, F25, 9) (dual of [31, 20, 10]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F, Q+4P) ⊂ AG(F, Q+5P) [i] based on
- linear OA(259, 26, F25, 9) (dual of [26, 17, 10]-code or 26-arc in PG(8,25)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,8P) with degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26 (see above)
- linear OA(256, 26, F25, 6) (dual of [26, 20, 7]-code or 26-arc in PG(5,25)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+8P) with degQ = 3 and degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26 (see above)
- linear OA(252, 5, F25, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,25)) (see above)
- construction X applied to AG(F, Q+4P) ⊂ AG(F, Q+5P) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(2599, 343, F25, 2, 40) (dual of [(343, 2), 587, 41]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding |