Information on Result #731788

Linear OA(8126, 135, F8, 95) (dual of [135, 9, 96]-code), using juxtaposition based on
  1. linear OA(856, 65, F8, 46) (dual of [65, 9, 47]-code), using
    • the BCH-code C(I) with length 65 | 84−1, defining interval I = {5,12,19,…,−5}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 47 [i]
  2. linear OA(861, 70, F8, 48) (dual of [70, 9, 49]-code), using
    • construction X applied to C([1,21]) ⊂ C({1,2,3,5,6,7,10,11,12,13,14,19,20,21}) [i] based on
      1. linear OA(860, 65, F8, 48) (dual of [65, 5, 49]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65 | 84−1, defining interval I = [1,27], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,20,48,…,8}|+1 = 49 (BCH-bound) [i]
      2. linear OA(856, 65, F8, 46) (dual of [65, 9, 47]-code), using the cyclic code C(A) with length 65 | 84−1, defining set A = {1,2,3,5,6,7,10,11,12,13,14,19,20,21}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{−25,−21,−17,…,25}|+1 = 47 (BCH-bound) [i]
      3. linear OA(81, 5, F8, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(8126, 135, F8, 94) (dual of [135, 9, 95]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OOA(8126, 45, F8, 3, 95) (dual of [(45, 3), 9, 96]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding