Information on Result #731792
Linear OA(888, 96, F8, 65) (dual of [96, 8, 66]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(815, 23, F8, 12) (dual of [23, 8, 13]-code), using
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,10P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- the Klein quartic over F8 [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,10P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- linear OA(865, 73, F8, 52) (dual of [73, 8, 53]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(53) ⊂ Ce(45) [i] based on
- linear OA(860, 64, F8, 54) (dual of [64, 4, 55]-code), using an extension Ce(53) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,53], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 54 [i]
- linear OA(856, 64, F8, 46) (dual of [64, 8, 47]-code), using an extension Ce(45) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,45], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 46 [i]
- linear OA(85, 9, F8, 5) (dual of [9, 4, 6]-code or 9-arc in PG(4,8)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(4,8) [i]
- construction X applied to Ce(53) ⊂ Ce(45) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.