Information on Result #731818

Linear OA(9117, 126, F9, 88) (dual of [126, 9, 89]-code), using juxtaposition based on
  1. linear OA(919, 28, F9, 16) (dual of [28, 9, 17]-code), using
  2. linear OA(989, 98, F9, 71) (dual of [98, 9, 72]-code), using
    • construction XX applied to Ce(70) ⊂ Ce(60) ⊂ Ce(59) [i] based on
      1. linear OA(978, 81, F9, 71) (dual of [81, 3, 72]-code), using an extension Ce(70) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,70], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 71 [i]
      2. linear OA(973, 81, F9, 61) (dual of [81, 8, 62]-code), using an extension Ce(60) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,60], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 61 [i]
      3. linear OA(972, 81, F9, 60) (dual of [81, 9, 61]-code), using an extension Ce(59) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,59], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 60 [i]
      4. linear OA(910, 16, F9, 9) (dual of [16, 6, 10]-code), using
      5. linear OA(90, 1, F9, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.