Information on Result #731828
Linear OA(9111, 119, F9, 86) (dual of [119, 8, 87]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(920, 28, F9, 17) (dual of [28, 8, 18]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,10P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,10P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- linear OA(983, 91, F9, 68) (dual of [91, 8, 69]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(69) ⊂ Ce(60) [i] based on
- linear OA(977, 81, F9, 70) (dual of [81, 4, 71]-code), using an extension Ce(69) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,69], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 70 [i]
- linear OA(973, 81, F9, 61) (dual of [81, 8, 62]-code), using an extension Ce(60) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,60], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 61 [i]
- linear OA(96, 10, F9, 6) (dual of [10, 4, 7]-code or 10-arc in PG(5,9)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(4,9) [i]
- construction X applied to Ce(69) ⊂ Ce(60) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.