Information on Result #732060
Linear OA(16126, 1048670, F16, 23) (dual of [1048670, 1048544, 24]-code), using (u, u+v)-construction based on
- linear OA(1620, 89, F16, 11) (dual of [89, 69, 12]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([3,12]), C2 = C([2,11]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([3,11]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([2,12]) [i] based on
- linear OA(1618, 85, F16, 10) (dual of [85, 67, 11]-code), using the BCH-code C(I) with length 85 | 162−1, defining interval I = {3,4,…,12}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- linear OA(1618, 85, F16, 10) (dual of [85, 67, 11]-code), using the BCH-code C(I) with length 85 | 162−1, defining interval I = {2,3,…,11}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- linear OA(1620, 85, F16, 11) (dual of [85, 65, 12]-code), using the BCH-code C(I) with length 85 | 162−1, defining interval I = {2,3,…,12}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- linear OA(1616, 85, F16, 9) (dual of [85, 69, 10]-code), using the BCH-code C(I) with length 85 | 162−1, defining interval I = {3,4,…,11}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- linear OA(160, 2, F16, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(160, s, F16, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(160, 2, F16, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([3,12]), C2 = C([2,11]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([3,11]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([2,12]) [i] based on
- linear OA(16106, 1048581, F16, 23) (dual of [1048581, 1048475, 24]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(22) ⊂ Ce(21) [i] based on
- linear OA(16106, 1048576, F16, 23) (dual of [1048576, 1048470, 24]-code), using an extension Ce(22) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1048575 = 165−1, defining interval I = [1,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(16101, 1048576, F16, 22) (dual of [1048576, 1048475, 23]-code), using an extension Ce(21) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1048575 = 165−1, defining interval I = [1,21], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- linear OA(160, 5, F16, 0) (dual of [5, 5, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(160, s, F16, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s (see above)
- construction X applied to Ce(22) ⊂ Ce(21) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.