Information on Result #732210
Linear OA(25109, 705, F25, 42) (dual of [705, 596, 43]-code), using (u, u+v)-construction based on
- linear OA(2526, 68, F25, 21) (dual of [68, 42, 22]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,43P) ⊂ AG(F,45P) [i] based on
- linear OA(2525, 65, F25, 21) (dual of [65, 40, 22]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,43P) [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- linear OA(2523, 65, F25, 19) (dual of [65, 42, 20]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,45P) [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66 (see above)
- linear OA(251, 3, F25, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(251, s, F25, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to AG(F,43P) ⊂ AG(F,45P) [i] based on
- linear OA(2583, 637, F25, 42) (dual of [637, 554, 43]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([620,36]), C2 = C([0,37]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,36]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([620,37]) [i] based on
- linear OA(2578, 624, F25, 41) (dual of [624, 546, 42]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−4,−3,…,36}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 42 [i]
- linear OA(2572, 624, F25, 38) (dual of [624, 552, 39]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = [0,37], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 39 [i]
- linear OA(2580, 624, F25, 42) (dual of [624, 544, 43]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−4,−3,…,37}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 43 [i]
- linear OA(2570, 624, F25, 37) (dual of [624, 554, 38]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = [0,36], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 38 [i]
- linear OA(253, 11, F25, 3) (dual of [11, 8, 4]-code or 11-arc in PG(2,25) or 11-cap in PG(2,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(253, 25, F25, 3) (dual of [25, 22, 4]-code or 25-arc in PG(2,25) or 25-cap in PG(2,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(22,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(253, 25, F25, 3) (dual of [25, 22, 4]-code or 25-arc in PG(2,25) or 25-cap in PG(2,25)), using
- linear OA(250, 2, F25, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(250, s, F25, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([620,36]), C2 = C([0,37]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,36]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([620,37]) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.