Information on Result #732253
Linear OA(25104, 705, F25, 40) (dual of [705, 601, 41]-code), using (u, u+v)-construction based on
- linear OA(2525, 68, F25, 20) (dual of [68, 43, 21]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,44P) ⊂ AG(F,46P) [i] based on
- linear OA(2524, 65, F25, 20) (dual of [65, 41, 21]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,44P) [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- linear OA(2522, 65, F25, 18) (dual of [65, 43, 19]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,46P) [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66 (see above)
- linear OA(251, 3, F25, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(251, s, F25, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to AG(F,44P) ⊂ AG(F,46P) [i] based on
- linear OA(2579, 637, F25, 40) (dual of [637, 558, 41]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([620,34]), C2 = C([0,35]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,34]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([620,35]) [i] based on
- linear OA(2574, 624, F25, 39) (dual of [624, 550, 40]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−4,−3,…,34}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 40 [i]
- linear OA(2568, 624, F25, 36) (dual of [624, 556, 37]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = [0,35], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 37 [i]
- linear OA(2576, 624, F25, 40) (dual of [624, 548, 41]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−4,−3,…,35}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 41 [i]
- linear OA(2566, 624, F25, 35) (dual of [624, 558, 36]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = [0,34], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 36 [i]
- linear OA(253, 11, F25, 3) (dual of [11, 8, 4]-code or 11-arc in PG(2,25) or 11-cap in PG(2,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(253, 25, F25, 3) (dual of [25, 22, 4]-code or 25-arc in PG(2,25) or 25-cap in PG(2,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(22,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(253, 25, F25, 3) (dual of [25, 22, 4]-code or 25-arc in PG(2,25) or 25-cap in PG(2,25)), using
- linear OA(250, 2, F25, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(250, s, F25, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([620,34]), C2 = C([0,35]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,34]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([620,35]) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.