Information on Result #737894

Linear OA(860, 85, F8, 37) (dual of [85, 25, 38]-code), using construction XX applied to Ce(36) ⊂ Ce(27) ⊂ Ce(26) based on
  1. linear OA(849, 64, F8, 37) (dual of [64, 15, 38]-code), using an extension Ce(36) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,36], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 37 [i]
  2. linear OA(840, 64, F8, 28) (dual of [64, 24, 29]-code), using an extension Ce(27) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,27], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 28 [i]
  3. linear OA(839, 64, F8, 27) (dual of [64, 25, 28]-code), using an extension Ce(26) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,26], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 27 [i]
  4. linear OA(810, 20, F8, 8) (dual of [20, 10, 9]-code), using
  5. linear OA(80, 1, F8, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(860, 85, F8, 36) (dual of [85, 25, 37]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(862, 87, F8, 37) (dual of [87, 25, 38]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space