Information on Result #826054
Linear OOA(451, 27, F4, 2, 39) (dual of [(27, 2), 3, 40]-NRT-code), using OOA 2-folding based on linear OA(451, 54, F4, 39) (dual of [54, 3, 40]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(451, 55, F4, 39) (dual of [55, 4, 40]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(169, 11, F16, 9) (dual of [11, 2, 10]-code or 11-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(169, 16, F16, 9) (dual of [16, 7, 10]-code or 16-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(169, 16, F16, 9) (dual of [16, 7, 10]-code or 16-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,4) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(169, 11, F16, 9) (dual of [11, 2, 10]-code or 11-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.