Information on Result #845186
Linear OOA(845, 35, F8, 2, 30) (dual of [(35, 2), 25, 31]-NRT-code), using OOA 2-folding based on linear OA(845, 70, F8, 30) (dual of [70, 25, 31]-code), using
- construction X applied to C({2,3,4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14,19}) ⊂ C({3,4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14,19}) [i] based on
- linear OA(844, 65, F8, 30) (dual of [65, 21, 31]-code), using the cyclic code C(A) with length 65 | 84−1, defining set A = {2,3,4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14,19}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{−16,12,40,…,16}|+1 = 31 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(840, 65, F8, 28) (dual of [65, 25, 29]-code), using the cyclic code C(A) with length 65 | 84−1, defining set A = {3,4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14,19}, and minimum distance d ≥ |{12,40,3,…,−12}|+1 = 29 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(81, 5, F8, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(81, s, F8, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.