Information on Result #907451

Linear OOA(282, 42, F2, 2, 69) (dual of [(42, 2), 2, 70]-NRT-code), using repeating each code word 14 times based on linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only		Method
1Linear OOA(282, 42, F2, 2, 68) (dual of [(42, 2), 2, 69]-NRT-code) [i]Strength Reduction for OOAs
2Linear OOA(282, 42, F2, 2, 67) (dual of [(42, 2), 2, 68]-NRT-code) [i]
3Linear OOA(282, 42, F2, 2, 66) (dual of [(42, 2), 2, 67]-NRT-code) [i]
4Linear OOA(282, 42, F2, 2, 65) (dual of [(42, 2), 2, 66]-NRT-code) [i]
5Linear OOA(282, 42, F2, 2, 64) (dual of [(42, 2), 2, 65]-NRT-code) [i]
6Linear OOA(282, 42, F2, 2, 63) (dual of [(42, 2), 2, 64]-NRT-code) [i]
7Linear OOA(280, 41, F2, 2, 67) (dual of [(41, 2), 2, 68]-NRT-code) [i]Truncation for OOAs
8Linear OOA(278, 40, F2, 2, 65) (dual of [(40, 2), 2, 66]-NRT-code) [i]
9Linear OOA(274, 38, F2, 2, 61) (dual of [(38, 2), 2, 62]-NRT-code) [i]
10Linear OOA(272, 37, F2, 2, 59) (dual of [(37, 2), 2, 60]-NRT-code) [i]
11Linear OOA(268, 35, F2, 2, 55) (dual of [(35, 2), 2, 56]-NRT-code) [i]
12Linear OOA(266, 34, F2, 2, 53) (dual of [(34, 2), 2, 54]-NRT-code) [i]
13Linear OOA(262, 32, F2, 2, 49) (dual of [(32, 2), 2, 50]-NRT-code) [i]
14Linear OOA(260, 31, F2, 2, 47) (dual of [(31, 2), 2, 48]-NRT-code) [i]
15Linear OOA(256, 29, F2, 2, 43) (dual of [(29, 2), 2, 44]-NRT-code) [i]
16Linear OOA(248, 25, F2, 2, 35) (dual of [(25, 2), 2, 36]-NRT-code) [i]
17Linear OOA(282, 21, F2, 4, 69) (dual of [(21, 4), 2, 70]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
18Linear OOA(282, 14, F2, 6, 69) (dual of [(14, 6), 2, 70]-NRT-code) [i]