Information on Result #908991
Linear OOA(289, 46, F2, 2, 63) (dual of [(46, 2), 3, 64]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(23, 3, F2, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(283, 43, F2, 2, 59) (dual of [(43, 2), 3, 60]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(23, 3, F2, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(277, 40, F2, 2, 55) (dual of [(40, 2), 3, 56]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 8 times [i] based on linear OOA(27, 5, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 8 times [i] based on linear OOA(27, 5, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 7]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(289, 46, F2, 2, 62) (dual of [(46, 2), 3, 63]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(289, 46, F2, 2, 61) (dual of [(46, 2), 3, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(289, 46, F2, 2, 60) (dual of [(46, 2), 3, 61]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OOA(289, 46, F2, 2, 59) (dual of [(46, 2), 3, 60]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OOA(285, 44, F2, 2, 59) (dual of [(44, 2), 3, 60]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 6 | Linear OOA(284, 43, F2, 2, 58) (dual of [(43, 2), 2, 59]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 7 | Linear OOA(289, 23, F2, 4, 63) (dual of [(23, 4), 3, 64]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |