Information on Result #908995
Linear OOA(2101, 52, F2, 2, 71) (dual of [(52, 2), 3, 72]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(23, 3, F2, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(295, 49, F2, 2, 67) (dual of [(49, 2), 3, 68]-NRT-code), using
- 2 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(297, 50, F2, 2, 69) (dual of [(50, 2), 3, 70]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 10 times [i] based on linear OOA(27, 5, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 10 times [i] based on linear OOA(27, 5, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 7]-NRT-code), using
- 2 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(297, 50, F2, 2, 69) (dual of [(50, 2), 3, 70]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(2101, 52, F2, 2, 70) (dual of [(52, 2), 3, 71]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(2101, 52, F2, 2, 69) (dual of [(52, 2), 3, 70]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(2101, 52, F2, 2, 68) (dual of [(52, 2), 3, 69]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OOA(2101, 52, F2, 2, 67) (dual of [(52, 2), 3, 68]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OOA(2101, 52, F2, 2, 66) (dual of [(52, 2), 3, 67]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | Linear OOA(2101, 52, F2, 2, 65) (dual of [(52, 2), 3, 66]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 7 | Linear OOA(2101, 26, F2, 4, 71) (dual of [(26, 4), 3, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |