Information on Result #909003
Linear OOA(2129, 66, F2, 2, 91) (dual of [(66, 2), 3, 92]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(23, 3, F2, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(2123, 63, F2, 2, 87) (dual of [(63, 2), 3, 88]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(23, 3, F2, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(2117, 60, F2, 2, 83) (dual of [(60, 2), 3, 84]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 12 times [i] based on linear OOA(27, 5, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 12 times [i] based on linear OOA(27, 5, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 7]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(2129, 66, F2, 2, 90) (dual of [(66, 2), 3, 91]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(2129, 66, F2, 2, 89) (dual of [(66, 2), 3, 90]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(2129, 66, F2, 2, 88) (dual of [(66, 2), 3, 89]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OOA(2128, 65, F2, 2, 90) (dual of [(65, 2), 2, 91]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 5 | Linear OOA(2125, 64, F2, 2, 87) (dual of [(64, 2), 3, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | Linear OOA(2120, 61, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(61, 2), 2, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 7 | Linear OOA(2129, 33, F2, 4, 91) (dual of [(33, 4), 3, 92]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |