Information on Result #910482
Linear OOA(8160, 82, F8, 2, 145) (dual of [(82, 2), 4, 146]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(814, 9, F8, 2, 14) (dual of [(9, 2), 4, 15]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;4,8) [i]
- linear OOA(8142, 73, F8, 2, 130) (dual of [(73, 2), 4, 131]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(812, 8, F8, 2, 12) (dual of [(8, 2), 4, 13]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;4,8) [i]
- linear OOA(8126, 65, F8, 2, 117) (dual of [(65, 2), 4, 118]-NRT-code), using
- standard lengthening with (d0,…,d1) = (116,117) [i] based on linear OOA(8124, 64, F8, 2, 115) (dual of [(64, 2), 4, 116]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,12P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- linear OOA(812, 8, F8, 2, 12) (dual of [(8, 2), 4, 13]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(8160, 82, F8, 2, 144) (dual of [(82, 2), 4, 145]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(8160, 82, F8, 2, 143) (dual of [(82, 2), 4, 144]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(8160, 82, F8, 2, 142) (dual of [(82, 2), 4, 143]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||