Information on Result #941538
Linear OOA(2139, 73, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(73, 2), 7, 83]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(239, 23, F2, 2, 23) (dual of [(23, 2), 7, 24]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(239, 24, F2, 2, 23) (dual of [(24, 2), 9, 24]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(85, 8, F8, 5) (dual of [8, 3, 6]-code or 8-arc in PG(4,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,8) [i]
- linear OOA(23, 3, F2, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,2) [i]
- linear OA(85, 8, F8, 5) (dual of [8, 3, 6]-code or 8-arc in PG(4,8)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(239, 24, F2, 2, 23) (dual of [(24, 2), 9, 24]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(293, 50, F2, 2, 58) (dual of [(50, 2), 7, 59]-NRT-code), using
- 1 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(294, 51, F2, 2, 59) (dual of [(51, 2), 8, 60]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.