Information on Result #941956
Linear OOA(4174, 89, F4, 2, 148) (dual of [(89, 2), 4, 149]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(44, 4, F4, 2, 4) (dual of [(4, 2), 4, 5]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;4,4) [i]
- linear OOA(4166, 85, F4, 2, 143) (dual of [(85, 2), 4, 144]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1615, 17, F16, 15) (dual of [17, 2, 16]-code or 17-arc in PG(14,16)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,16) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,16) [i]
- linear OOA(48, 5, F4, 2, 8) (dual of [(5, 2), 2, 9]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,4) [i]
- linear OA(1615, 17, F16, 15) (dual of [17, 2, 16]-code or 17-arc in PG(14,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(4174, 89, F4, 2, 147) (dual of [(89, 2), 4, 148]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(4174, 89, F4, 2, 146) (dual of [(89, 2), 4, 147]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(4174, 89, F4, 2, 145) (dual of [(89, 2), 4, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OOA(4174, 89, F4, 2, 144) (dual of [(89, 2), 4, 145]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OOA(4182, 93, F4, 2, 153) (dual of [(93, 2), 4, 154]-NRT-code) | [i] | Juxtaposition for OOAs | |
| 6 | Linear OOA(4184, 94, F4, 2, 155) (dual of [(94, 2), 4, 156]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||