Information on Result #967865
Linear OOA(4194, 96, F4, 3, 80) (dual of [(96, 3), 94, 81]-NRT-code), using OOA 3-folding based on linear OA(4194, 288, F4, 80) (dual of [288, 94, 81]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4194, 290, F4, 80) (dual of [290, 96, 81]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6426, 58, F64, 26) (dual of [58, 32, 27]-code or 58-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6426, 64, F64, 26) (dual of [64, 38, 27]-code or 64-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(38,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6426, 64, F64, 26) (dual of [64, 38, 27]-code or 64-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(6426, 58, F64, 26) (dual of [58, 32, 27]-code or 58-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.