Information on Result #1146248
Linear OOA(299, 17, F2, 6, 90) (dual of [(17, 6), 3, 91]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(6;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(281, 14, F2, 6, 74) (dual of [(14, 6), 3, 75]-NRT-code), using
- 6 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(287, 15, F2, 6, 80) (dual of [(15, 6), 3, 81]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 3 times [i] based on linear OOA(227, 5, F2, 6, 26) (dual of [(5, 6), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(6;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 3 times [i] based on linear OOA(227, 5, F2, 6, 26) (dual of [(5, 6), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- 6 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(287, 15, F2, 6, 80) (dual of [(15, 6), 3, 81]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(299, 17, F2, 6, 89) (dual of [(17, 6), 3, 90]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(299, 17, F2, 6, 88) (dual of [(17, 6), 3, 89]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(299, 17, F2, 6, 87) (dual of [(17, 6), 3, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OOA(299, 17, F2, 6, 86) (dual of [(17, 6), 3, 87]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OOA(299, 17, F2, 6, 85) (dual of [(17, 6), 3, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||