Information on Result #1154437
Linear OOA(2222, 35, F2, 7, 98) (dual of [(35, 7), 23, 99]-NRT-code), using OOA 2-folding based on linear OOA(2222, 70, F2, 4, 98) (dual of [(70, 4), 58, 99]-NRT-code), using
- 6 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2228, 72, F2, 4, 104) (dual of [(72, 4), 60, 105]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6414, 24, F64, 14) (dual of [24, 10, 15]-code or 24-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6414, 64, F64, 14) (dual of [64, 50, 15]-code or 64-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(50,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6414, 64, F64, 14) (dual of [64, 50, 15]-code or 64-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- linear OOA(26, 3, F2, 4, 6) (dual of [(3, 4), 6, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;6,2) [i]
- linear OA(6414, 24, F64, 14) (dual of [24, 10, 15]-code or 24-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.