Information on Result #1288582

Linear OA(2168, 200, F2, 67) (dual of [200, 32, 68]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
  1. linear OA(1617, 25, F16, 16) (dual of [25, 8, 17]-code), using
  2. linear OA(24, 8, F2, 3) (dual of [8, 4, 4]-code or 8-cap in PG(3,2)), using

Mode: Linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(2168, 200, F2, 66) (dual of [200, 32, 67]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(2168, 200, F2, 65) (dual of [200, 32, 66]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(2168, 200, F2, 64) (dual of [200, 32, 65]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(2169, 201, F2, 67) (dual of [201, 32, 68]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
5Linear OA(2170, 202, F2, 67) (dual of [202, 32, 68]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(2171, 203, F2, 67) (dual of [203, 32, 68]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(2172, 204, F2, 67) (dual of [204, 32, 68]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(2173, 205, F2, 67) (dual of [205, 32, 68]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(2167, 199, F2, 66) (dual of [199, 32, 67]-code) [i]Truncation
10Linear OA(2166, 198, F2, 65) (dual of [198, 32, 66]-code) [i]