Information on Result #1297217
Linear OA(2105, 201, F2, 28) (dual of [201, 96, 29]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(2102, 197, F2, 28) (dual of [197, 95, 29]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2103, 198, F2, 29) (dual of [198, 95, 30]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(3214, 33, F32, 14) (dual of [33, 19, 15]-code or 33-arc in PG(13,32)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(19,32) [i]
- linear OA(21, 6, F2, 1) (dual of [6, 5, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(3214, 33, F32, 14) (dual of [33, 19, 15]-code or 33-arc in PG(13,32)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2103, 198, F2, 29) (dual of [198, 95, 30]-code), using
- linear OA(2102, 198, F2, 25) (dual of [198, 96, 26]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 2102 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 5 060879 237640 181849 608771 374824 [i]
- linear OA(22, 3, F2, 2) (dual of [3, 1, 3]-code or 3-arc in PG(1,2)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 3 [i]
- Hamming code H(2,2) [i]
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.