Information on Result #1297262
Linear OA(2135, 201, F2, 40) (dual of [201, 66, 41]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(2132, 197, F2, 40) (dual of [197, 65, 41]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2133, 198, F2, 41) (dual of [198, 65, 42]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(3220, 33, F32, 20) (dual of [33, 13, 21]-code or 33-arc in PG(19,32)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(13,32) [i]
- linear OA(21, 6, F2, 1) (dual of [6, 5, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(3220, 33, F32, 20) (dual of [33, 13, 21]-code or 33-arc in PG(19,32)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2133, 198, F2, 41) (dual of [198, 65, 42]-code), using
- linear OA(2132, 198, F2, 37) (dual of [198, 66, 38]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 2132 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 4544 697303 306397 300553 342614 577130 907790 [i]
- linear OA(22, 3, F2, 2) (dual of [3, 1, 3]-code or 3-arc in PG(1,2)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 3 [i]
- Hamming code H(2,2) [i]
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.