Information on Result #1304126
Linear OA(338, 100, F3, 13) (dual of [100, 62, 14]-code), using 8 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0) based on linear OA(332, 86, F3, 13) (dual of [86, 54, 14]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(10) [i] based on
- linear OA(331, 81, F3, 13) (dual of [81, 50, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 34−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(327, 81, F3, 11) (dual of [81, 54, 12]-code), using an extension Ce(10) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 34−1, defining interval I = [1,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- linear OA(31, 5, F3, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.